![]() ![]() He said there are other jail staff who can monitor the cameras from their work stations, as can the deputy assigned to the jail and the sheriff.Ĭurley believes the grand jury was surprised to learn each pod in the maximum security wing - which is a secure area unto itself - is generally staffed by one CO. He said there is someone in the main control room at all times where the camera monitors are, and one of their duties is to monitor the camera system. For example, the report stated the camera system should be monitored by staff around the clock. There were other issues raised in the grand jury report that Curley believes were opinions based on a lack of understanding about how the jail operates. The jail staff had failed to arrange for a sheriff’s deputy to accompany the prisoner to the hospital and bring him back, which is policy. 7, a man taken to the jail following his arrest for violating a protection order later walked away after being taken to a local hospital to be examined. One returned to the jail and other two were caught the next day. In June, three inmates escaped from the minimum security wing by breaking out a window and cutting a hole in the fence using a cutting device that staff believe was placed by the fence for them to use. The grand jury report also comes after two recent publicized incidents. The jail has come under increased scrutiny over the past two years following a steady stream of county sheriff’s reports about incidents at the facility and other complaints. One of his staff did recognize a grand juror as the parent of two people who had been inmates, he said. “They had to come here with preconceptions because you can’t come to some of the conclusions they came to without talking to staff or prisoners, and they did neither,” Curley said. The inmates in the maximum security wing remained secured in the pods and never came in contact with jurors, but the grand jury did see several inmates in passing when touring the minimum security wing. The only person the grand jurors appeared to speak with a length, besides Curley, was the food service supervisor while touring the kitchen. To support his claim, Curley allowed this reporter to watch the video of the grand jury tour. They were able to look into the pods from the safety of the main hallway as they toured the jail. They didn’t talk to a single corrections officer and they didn’t go into a single pod (cell block),” he said. They were brought to the jail from the county courthouse by a sheriff’s deputy, and Curley said they spent the first 38 minutes meeting with him in his office and 36 minutes touring the jail. For example, the latest report does not include any additional details about why they believe “the jail is totally unsafe” or why they believed inmates were running the facility.Ĭurley has no idea how the grand jury reached that conclusion from the Aug. ![]() The findings are always brief, usually consisting of a series of bullet points, and never come with specifics to support any of the conclusions. The grand jurors are to inquire about the treatment of inmates, their diet and accommodations. The report is prepared by the county prosecutor’s office based on the grand jury comments. State law requires county jails be inspected by the grand jury at least four times per year, and their findings are included in the grand jury report that accompanies the list of people who have been indicted, which is made public. “I don’t know how they reached some of the conclusions when in a 40-minute tour they didn’t talk to any (COs) or inmates,” said Mike Curley, who met with the nine grand jurors before accompanying them on their tour. ![]() The report, among other things, concluded the jail is “totally unsafe,” that inmates were running the facility and some of the corrections officers seem intimidated by them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |